Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Land Ethics

In the world of agriculture there is a constant struggle for land use. With any use of land come ethical issues. Is it right to turn wilderness into fields? Or is it right to turn farmland into developed land? These are two ethical issues that come from land management that have a direct effect on the food market as well as the ecosystem. There are many benefits to farmland as well as disadvantages. Therefore advancements in land production must be made to use farmland to its full potential.

There is a constant struggle in developed countries to keep farm land and ranch land. A study by American Farmland Trust estimates that fifty acres of farm and ranch land are lost to development each hour in the United States. They also state that twenty-four million acres of agricultural land has been developed since 1982. These are alarming rates for farming and ranching in the United States and the future of agriculture. The numbers potentially have a direct impact on the countries food production. Farm and ranch land also serve as habitats for many forms of wildlife. This habitat loss can force animals to move into developed areas where they might not thrive.

Developing is necessary for expansion of the population and industry. The population of the country and world are only growing which is where expanding into new land is necessary. Industry also requires new facilities and buildings in order to grow. The rapid expansion outward poses a threat to valuable land, but the growth must go somewhere, so why not up or in older developed areas that no longer serve a purpose? Fargo for an example keeps growing outward instead of upward. There are new developments everyday it seems, but all these new buildings never seem to be more than two or three stories tall. Maybe the costs are too high to build up, but the problem with expanding out is once the land is converted it is highly unlikely for the land to be used for agriculture ever again. The abundance of land in the area currently makes it easy for expansion out, but someday the limit may be reached and practices similar to the expanding in Fargo will have to change drastically.

There are also developing countries that have converted valuable natural habitats such as forests into farm land. Places like the Amazon rainforest, the Brazilian savanna, and rainforests in the lowland of Indonesia all are under fire as farming and ranching becomes more popular. The loss of forests to rapidly expanding agriculture poses a huge problem, but one of the biggest problems come from the mono culture practices of these developing countries. Once land has been used in monoculture, or used for one specific crop, the land loses important nutrients needed to grow the crop. This leads to more land clearing instead of proper land management and crop rotation. And with more land clearing, animals that live in these forests such as tigers, elephants, rhinoceros, and many other species are forced out of their habitats, leading to decreased numbers and endangerment.

The farmers in these developing countries are only doing what it takes to provide the crops that are in demand. They plant soybeans or corn in a mono culture because it is the most profitable for them to grow. The land is cheap for them to clear and plant more crops, so they don’t worry about whether the land they clear is taken care of properly. These practices will lead to poor land, and more land clearing to keep up with the demand.
Oliver Dixon [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

I believe that it is a shame to convert agricultural land into developed land, but to a certain extent it must be done. Expansion of developed land is necessary, but proper expansion needs to be taken into consideration as land is limited in the world. The growth of farming in developing countries is very important to their economies, but proper use of the land they clear should be considered. Forests are an important part of the world’s ecosystem. Farmers in such areas have to consider the long term effects of clearing these forests. The only real solution to these problems comes from agricultural advancements in land management that help farmers and ranchers to use the land to its full potential making it possible to achieve the same yield goals using less land.

Works Cited:


Thursday, April 2, 2015

Drones

In today’s agriculture, technology is used wherever and whenever possible. Recently, within the past couple years the use of drones in agriculture has become a very hot topic. The potential benefit of the use of drones is sky high. Using drones opens a whole new world of opportunity for technology in the agricultural field. However drones still aren't widely accepted in the United States and with their private use expanding to a larger scale comes a lot of controversy.

The main benefit of using drones in agriculture is their ability to inexpensively tell a farmer how their field is functioning at virtually any time of the day, given the weather permits flight. Drones have the capability to help farmers advance to a new level of crop management. In an afternoon a farmer could use a drone to fly over his fields and tell him what he needs to know in order to grow his crops to their potential. The drone would send real time images with true color, infrared, and thermal imaging. These images could then be used to spot potential pest outbreaks, weed outbreaks, areas that need water, and so much more. Once the data from the drone determines a pest infestation for example, the farmer can then act and treat the specific area. This would save the farmer money and time by minimizing the infestation and minimizing the area sprayed. An article by 9 News in Colorado claimed a farmer could save $20 dollars an acre by using drones.

"ILA 2010 Samstag 099" by ILA-boy - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ILA_2010_Samstag_099.JPG#/media/File:ILA_2010_Samstag_099.JPG

With the expansion of such technology, problems will follow. Along with all the benefits comes the threat of privacy infractions. Farmers worry about others looking at their fields and other parts of their property. Others also worry about using drones for spying on people and the ease of access that would come with such a market.

The Federal Aviation Administration has yet to make official laws for drones. There will be restrictions on drone flight in order to contain the usage. Drone operators will be required to fly under a certain height above the ground and the drone would have to stay within the sight of the operator. Certain areas such as airports would also be off limits in order to avoid mid-air incidents with manned aircraft. Among other details, operators would be required to pass a written test to become certified. The test would have to be renewed every two years or so, similar to other certifications in the agricultural field already in place.

As restrictions are lifted, people will begin to warm up to the idea of using drones in a commercial sense with all the possibilities they bring. Currently companies can use drones for mainly research with the proper permit from the FAA. Most states do not currently have restrictions on drones, but as the idea of drone usage becomes more and more popular many states have passed restrictions on how they can be used and what they can be used for. The FAA is still working on legislation defining drones and the federal restrictions that will be implemented.

Works Cited:
9 News
National Conference of State Legislatures